1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 65 F.3d
  5. 65 F.3d 764 (1995)
 

KING v. AC & R ADVERTISING

No. 94-55327.

65 F.3d 764 (1995)

Patrick H. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AC & R ADVERTISING; Saatchi & Saatchi Company PLC; Alvin Chereskin; Harry J. Koenig, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 7, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Palmer, Perkins Coie, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gregory W. Homer, Anderson, Kill, Olick & Oshinsky, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees.

Before: LAY, BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

Patrick King sued defendants AC & R Advertising, Inc. ("AC & R"), Alvin Chereskin, and Harry Koenig, for wrongful termination and age discrimination under California state laws. The district court dismissed King's claim against Chereskin and Koenig (as individuals) for age discrimination under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, and granted the defendants summary judgment on King's breach of contract, age discrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases