1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 280 N.J.
  5. 280 N.J. Super. 478 (1995)
 

OACHS v. STANTON

280 N.J. Super. 478 (1995)

655 A.2d 965

PAULA DE PONTREX OACHS, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. STANLEY P. STANTON AND EDWARD STANTON, DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Heaney argued the cause for appellant Stanley Stanton (Mr. Heaney on the brief).

Edward Stanton pro se appellant argued the cause (Mr. Stanton on the brief).

Edward T. Feurey argued the cause for respondent (Paschon and Feurey, attorneys; Mr. Feurey, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, WALLACE and KLEINER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WALLACE, J.A.D.

Defendants Stanley Stanton and Edward Stanton appeal from a bench trial verdict in favor of plaintiff Paula De Pontrex Oachs ordering Stanley to reconvey certain property to plaintiff, and from an order denying their motions for reconsideration. Although submitted in separate briefs, defendants essentially contend that the trial court misapplied the Rules of Professional Conduct; that a fully executed gift...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases