1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 279 N.J.
  5. 279 N.J. Super. 471 (1995)
 

KESSLER v. ANTINORA

279 N.J. Super. 471 (1995)

653 A.2d 579

ROBERT H. KESSLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD ANTINORA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl E. Klotz argued the cause for appellant (Klotz & McCann, attorneys; Mr. Klotz, on the brief).

Peter M. Bray argued the cause for respondent (Bray, Chiocca, Rappaport & Rothstadt, attorneys; Mr. Bray, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, MUIR, Jr. and EICHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

I

Plaintiff Robert H. Kessler and defendant Richard Antinora entered into a written agreement for the purpose of building and selling a single-family residence on a lot in Wayne in Passaic County. The concept of the agreement seemed simple: Kessler was to provide the money and Antinora was to act as general contractor. Profits would be divided — 60% to Kessler, 40% to Antinora — after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases