PINE STREET MGT. CORP. v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE


15 N.J. Tax 688 (1995)

PINE STREET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, AS NET LESSEE (30 EVERGREEN PLACE), PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT. PINE STREET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, AS NET LESSEE (50 SOUTH CLINTON STREET), PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 18, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saul R. Fenchel, attorneys for plaintiff-appellant Pine Street Management (Loren B. Schindler, on the brief).

Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, attorneys for respondents 50 South Clinton Street and 30 Evergreen Place (Michael I. Schneck, of counsel and on the brief; Alan R. Hammer, and Jill Daitch Rosenberg, on the brief).

Medvin & Elberg, attorneys for respondent City of East Orange (Philip Elberg and Edna Y. Baugh, on the brief).

Before Judges WALLACE and NEWMAN.


PER CURIAM.

Pine Street Management Corporation appeals from an order of the Tax Court denying its motion requesting distribution of a tax refund and imposition and enforcement of an attorney's lien on the refund with respect to 30 Evergreen Place. We affirm.

This is a companion case to docket no. A-0387-94T5. Plaintiff retained the firm of Saul R. Fenchel, P.A. (Fenschel) to prosecute tax appeals on its behalf for 1992 and 1993 with respect to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases