1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 337 Md.
  5. 337 Md. 361 (1995)
 

ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N v. KENT

Misc. (Subtitle BV), No. 48, September Term, 1993.

337 Md. 361 (1995)

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION v. MICHAEL GAYHART KENT.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

February 10, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and James P. Botluk, Asst. Bar Counsel, for the Atty. Grievance Com'n of Maryland, for petitioner.

Edward Smith, Jr., Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.

RAKER, Judge.

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, charged the respondent, Michael Gayhart Kent, with violations of Rule 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: General Rule), Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal), Rule 3.4 (Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel), Rule 4.2 (Communication with Person Represented by Counsel), and Rule 8.4 (Misconduct) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. These charges stem from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases