1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 279 N.J.
  5. 279 N.J. Super. 372 (1995)
 

CHAS. BLOOM & CO. v. ECHO JEWELERS

279 N.J. Super. 372 (1995)

652 A.2d 1238

CHARLES BLOOM & COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ECHO JEWELERS AND MARK & RICHARD WHOLESALE JEWELERS, DEFENDANTS, AND MARK LAMOTTA AND RICHARD JADOS, A/K/A RICHARD DIADJODOS, T/A ECHO JEWELERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 1, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys for appellant (Anthony P. Pasquarelli, of counsel and on the brief).

John Feniak, attorney for respondent (Jill A. Judge, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, VILLANUEVA and BRAITHWAITE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by VILLANUEVA, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a finding of no cause of action against the two individual defendants who allegedly converted plaintiff's diamonds. We reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

Plaintiff, Charles Bloom and Company, was and is a sole proprietorship engaged in the business of wholesale diamond sales. Defendants, Mark LaMotta and Richard Gziadosz, were the owners and joint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases