1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 338 Md.
  5. 338 Md. 88 (1995)
 

BALTIMORE v. CASSIDY

No. 59, September Term, 1994.

338 Md. 88 (1995)

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. EUGENE CASSIDY.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

April 10, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert Burgunder, Jr., Sr. Sol., and David Allen, Asst. City Sol. (Stanley C. Rogosin, Principal Counsel, all on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Karl H. Goodman (Karl H. Goodman, P.A., on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

John C. Seipp, Benjamin L. Willey, Adkins, Potts & Smethurst, on brief, Salisbury, for amicus curiae, Delmarva Power and Light Co.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, BELL and RAKER, JJ.

BELL, Judge.

We granted certiorari to determine whether the loss of two eyes in a single accident, which does not result in permanent total disability, is compensable pursuant to Maryland Code (1991) § 9-627(d)(1)(vi), of the Labor and Employment Article, at double the rate for the loss of one eye, or under § 9-627(k), "Other Cases." The Workers' Compensation Commission ("the Commission") determined that such a loss, together with other injuries sustained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases