1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 65 F.3d
  5. 65 F.3d 347 (1995)
 

BUONOCORE v. HARRIS

Nos. 94-1901, 94-1932.

65 F.3d 347 (1995)

Daniel G. BUONOCORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald L. HARRIS, Special Agent, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Defendant-Appellant, and David R. Cundiff, Deputy Sheriff, Franklin County Sheriff's Department; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia; James D. Thompson, Assistant Manager, Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia; Linda Sue Taylor; United States of America, Defendants. Daniel G. BUONOCORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David R. CUNDIFF, Deputy Sheriff, Franklin County Sheriff's Department, Defendant-Appellant, and Donald L. Harris, Special Agent, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia; James D. Thompson, Assistant Manager, Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia; Linda Sue Taylor; United States of America, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided September 12, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Valerie Lisabeth Tetro, Joseph F. Cunningham & Associates, Washington, DC, for appellant Harris; Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, VA, for appellant Cundiff. Terry N. Grimes, King, Fulghum, Snead, Nixon & Grimes, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for appellee. ON BRIEF: Joseph F. Cunningham, Joseph F. Cunningham & Associates, Washington, DC, for appellant Harris; W. Fain Rutherford, Randy V. Cargill, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, VA, for appellant Cundiff. John T. Boitnott, Rocky Mount, VA, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge HAMILTON and Judge WILLIAMS joined.

OPINION

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

In this case a homeowner alleged that two law enforcement officers, after obtaining a warrant to search his home, invited a private person to engage in an independent general search of the home for items never mentioned in the warrant. In the face of these allegations, the officers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases