1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 72 Ohio
  5. 72 Ohio St.3d 249 (1995)
 

STATE EX REL. BITTER v. MISSIG

No. 94-2096.

72 Ohio St.3d 249 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. BITTER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MISSIG, CLERK, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 24, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fuller & Henry, Stephen B. Mosier and Daniel T. Ellis, for appellants.

Spengler Nathanson and Theodore M. Rowen, for appellee Shirley Missig.

Eastman & Smith, James F. Nooney and Stuart J. Goldberg, for appellees Charles L. Jones and Phillip C. Jones.

Per Curiam.

Appellants assert in their sole proposition of law that the court of appeals abused its discretion by refusing to enforce or compel compliance with its writ of mandamus. The court of appeals possesses both inherent and statutory authority to compel compliance with its lawfully issued orders. Cramer v. Petrie (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 131, 133-134, 637 N.E.2d 882, 884-885; State ex rel. Johnson v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases