1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 910 F.Supp.
  5. 910 F.Supp. 1385 (1995)
 

ARNOLD v. STATE OF ARK.

Nos. LR-C-94-177, LR-C-93-884 and PB-C-94-99.

910 F.Supp. 1385 (1995)

James L. ARNOLD, et al., Tim Loggins, et al., Dennis Stoneman, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

December 11, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Martin, David Brent Sterling, Martin, Trumbo & Sterling, Fayetteville, AR, George Chaddwick Mason, Stutte & Mason, P.L.C., Fayetteville, AR, Katharine Cox Day, Monticello, AR, Bernard Kenneth Johnson, Dumas, AR, and Stephen E. Fisher, Fisher Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for plaintiffs.

Sarah Lewis James, William Fred Knight, Attorney General's Office, Little Rock, AR, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs Arnold and Stoneman's Motions for Leave to Amend Complaint and all parties' Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (which the Court will address later in this Order).

I. Motions for Leave to Amend Complaints

Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that once a responsive pleading has been served, "a party may amend the party's pleading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases