1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 882 F.Supp.
  5. 882 F.Supp. 1401 (1995)
 

SADO v. ELLIS

No. 90 Civ. 1634 (RO).

882 F.Supp. 1401 (1995)

Jeffrey H. SADO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Robin ELLIS, Robert Morrison and Robin Ellis Productions, Ltd., Plaintiffs, v. Steven ISRAEL and One Times Square Associates Limited Partnership, One Times Square Management Corp., Old Country Management Corp. and Marc Washington, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 18, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacobson & Colfin, New York City, for plaintiffs (Bruce Colfin, of counsel).

Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, New York City, for defendants (Daniel Hughes and Michelle Sullivan, of counsel).

Plaintiff-Intervenor Jeffrey Sado, pro se.

OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and defendants each move for summary judgment against plaintiff-intervenor Jeffrey Sado.1 Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). The non-moving party "cannot escape summary judgment merely by vaguely asserting the existence of some unspecified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases