1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 883 F.Supp.
  5. 883 F.Supp. 1396 (1995)
 

U.S. v. MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORP. OF CALIFORNIA

No. CV 90-3122 AAH.

883 F.Supp. 1396 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America; State of California, ex rel., Department of Fish and Game, State Lands Commission, and Department of Parks and Recreation, Plaintiffs, v. MONTROSE CHEMICAL CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA; Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Company; Atkemix Thirty-Seven, Inc.; Stauffer Management Company; ICI American Holdings, Inc.; Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Potlatch Corporation; Simpson Paper Company; and County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles, Defendants. And Related Third Party Actions.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

April 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald F. George, Helen Kang, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment & Natural Resources Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, San Francisco, CA, Adam M. Kushner, Robert Oakley, Sharon Zamore, Steven O'Rourke, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment & Natural Resources Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff the U.S.

John A. Saurenman, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, CA, Sara J. Russell, Deputy Atty. Gen., Oakland, CA, for the State of Cal.

Moses Lasky, Charles B. Cohler, David M. Rosenberg-Wohl, William A. Logan, Jr., Lasky, Haas, Cohler, & Munter, San Francisco, CA, for Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

Karl S. Lytz, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, CA, Kimberly M. McCormick, Latham & Watkins, San Diego, CA, for Montrose Chemical Corp. of California.

Frank Rothman, Peter Simshauser, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Los Angeles, CA, for Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.

Paul B. Galvani, Ropes & Gray, Boston, MA, for defendants Rhone-Poulenc, Stauffer Management, Atkemix and ICI American Holdings, Inc.

AMENDED DECISION, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND REASONING SUPPORTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS AS TO THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BASED ON THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS (To Make Minor Changes)

HAUK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The United States and the State of California ("Plaintiffs") brought suit through a second amended complaint on August 16, 1991 for violations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases