1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 913 F.Supp.
  5. 913 F.Supp. 1148 (1995)
 

TO-AM EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. MITSUBISHI CATERPILLAR

No. 95 C 0836.

913 F.Supp. 1148 (1995)

TO-AM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. MITSUBISHI CATERPILLAR FORKLIFT AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

October 16, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary W. Leydig, Levin, McParland, Phillips, Leydig & Haberkorn, Chicago, IL, for To-Am Equipment Company, Inc. and Richard T. Todd.

John Edward Burke, Charles Daniel Knight, Burke, Weaver & Prell, Chicago, IL, Angela Marsh, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Chicago, IL, Jacqueline Williams Vlaming, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, for defendants and counter-claimant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff To-Am Equipment Company brings this diversity action against Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America (MCFA), Mitsubishi Distribution, Inc. (MDI), and several corporate directors, officers, and employees of MCFA and MDI.1 To-Am, a former franchisee of MCFA and MDI, alleges that the defendants violated provisions of the Franchise Disclosure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases