1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 877 F.Supp.
  5. 877 F.Supp. 1180 (1995)
 

LUBKEMAN v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.

No. 93 C 4142.

877 F.Supp. 1180 (1995)

Arnold F. LUBKEMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

February 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leon M. Despres, Thomas Howard Geoghegan, Robert Chuck Drizin, Despres Schwartz & Geoghegan, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff Arnold F. Lubkeman.

Julie O'Donnell Allen, Lisa D. Freeman, Sidley & Austin, Chicago, IL, for defendant Commonwealth Edison Co.

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Before the court is the motion of Defendant Commonwealth Edison Company ("ComEd") for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

FACTS1

Plaintiff Arnold F. Lubkeman ("Lubkeman") brings this lawsuit pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. In his single-count complaint, Lubkeman alleges that ComEd terminated him due to his age rather...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases