1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 919 F.Supp.
  5. 919 F.Supp. 1091 (1995)
 

LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. UNITED STATES SHOE CORP.

No. C2-95-244.

919 F.Supp. 1091 (1995)

LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES SHOE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

March 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Brennan Ridgley and Laura G. Kuykendall, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Columbus, Ohio, for Plaintiffs.

Joseph J. Dehner, Frederick J. McGavran and Adam P. Hall, Frost & Jacobs, Cincinnati, Ohio, and Michael Karl Yarbrough, Frost & Jacobs, Columbus, Ohio, for Defendant, United States Shoe Corp.

Samuel H. Simon and Daniel Allen Malkoff, Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, Ohio, for Defendant, State of Ohio.

OPINION AND ORDER

GRAHAM, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Avant-Garde Optics, Inc. ("Avant-Garde") for a hearing and an order requiring the defendant United States Shoe Corporation ("U.S. Shoe") to show cause why an order should not be entered directing it to provide shareholder records.

Avant-Garde is a subsidiary corporation of Luxottica Group...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases