1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 878 F.Supp.
  5. 878 F.Supp. 1114 (1995)
 

POPE v. INLAND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC.

No. 94 C 1845.

878 F.Supp. 1114 (1995)

Michael POPE, Plaintiff, v. INLAND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC. and Martin Boyer Company, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

February 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Francis Maglione, Marybeth Dougherty, David M. Wittenberg, Wittenberg & Dougherty, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for plaintiff Michael Pope.

Dale D. Pierson, Catherine Marie Chapman, Brian C. Hlavin, Laura M. Finnegan, Baum, Sigman, Auerbach, Pierson & Neuman, Chicago, IL, for defendant Inland Property Management, Inc.

Scott R. Britton, Braun, Lynch, Smith & Strobel, Ltd., Denis Jerome Quinlan, Rollins, Hudig, Hall & Co., Chicago, IL, for defendant Martin Boyer Co. Inc.

MEMORANDUM, OPINION AND ORDER

ANDERSEN, District Judge.

This action is before the court on the motions to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Michael Pope by defendants Inland Property Management ("IPM") and Martin Boyer Company, Inc. ("Boyer"). Both IPM and Boyer move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Specifically, IPM and Boyer argue that dismissal is necessary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases