1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 877 F.Supp.
  5. 877 F.Supp. 1055 (1995)
 

ISELY v. CAPUCHIN PROVINCE

No. 93-CV-74820-DT.

877 F.Supp. 1055 (1995)

Paul ISELY, Plaintiff, v. CAPUCHIN PROVINCE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

March 7, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heidi L. Salter and Don Ferris, Ann Arbor, MI, for plaintiff.

James N. Martin and Michael R. Janes, Mt. Clemens, MI, for defendants Capuchin, St. Lawrence, Thiel, Hoelscher, Kowalsky, Werner Wolf and Smith.

Frank W. Brochert, Detroit, MI, for Jim Wolfe, Gerald Boyle, Milwaukee, WI, for defendant Leifeld.

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERTS

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is presently before the Court on two motions in limine filed by Defendants, one submitted just before trial and one submitted during trial, to preclude or limit the scope of the testimony of Plaintiff's psychological experts, including Dr. Carol Hartman, who is Plaintiff's treating therapist...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases