1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 913 F.Supp.
  5. 913 F.Supp. 1014 (1995)
 

DONNELLY CORP. v. GENTEX CORP.

No. 1:93-CV-530.

913 F.Supp. 1014 (1995)

DONNELLY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GENTEX CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

August 29, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grant J. Gruel, Thomas R. Behm, Gruel, Mills, Nims & Pylman, Grand Rapids, MI, John Augustine O'Brien, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, for plaintiff.

William L. Fette, Cornell, Dalzell, Fette, Ramey & Shek, Kalamazoo, MI, John Tramontine, Fish & Neave, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on various motions of plaintiff Donnelly Corporation and defendant Gentex Corporation for summary judgment and other relief. This action concerns charges that the defendant infringed as to three separate Donnelly patents (U.S.Patent nos. 4,646,210, 4,733,336, and 5,066,112).1 For the reasons that follow, the Court grants the motions in part and denies the motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases