1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 874 F.Supp.
  5. 874 F.Supp. 933 (1995)
 

SHIPLEY v. DUGAN

No. IP89-1126-C-T/G.

874 F.Supp. 933 (1995)

Selma SHIPLEY, Plaintiff, v. Susan Forster DUGAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

January 19, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Groth, Neal E. Gath, Fillenwarth Dennerline Groth & Towe, Indianapolis, IN, for plaintiff.

Jon Laramore, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the Attorney General, Michael R. Morow, Stephenson & Kurnik, Indianapolis, IN, for defendants.

Memorandum Entry Regarding Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment

TINDER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon the motions of Defendants Susan Forster Dugan ("Dugan"), Chris D. Monroe ("Monroe") and Norman D. Curry ("Curry") (collectively "the Judges") and Defendant Randy Allman ("Allman") for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court, having considered the motions, affidavits and supporting and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases