PHIBRO ENERGY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Ronald H. BROWN, et al., Defendants.
United States Court of International Trade.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 9, 1995.
May 9, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC (John G. Kester and David D. Aufhauser), for plaintiffs.
Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen. of the U.S.; Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice (Mark S. Sochaczewsky and Carla Garcia Benitez); Robert J. Heilferty, Atty.-Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Admin., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC, for defendants.
Bracewell & Patterson, Washington, DC (Scott H. Segal and Gene E. Godley) and S. Lee Wingate, Texas City, TX (Counsel to the City of Texas City), of Counsel, for amici curiae the City of Texas City, the Texas City Independent School Dist., the County of Galveston, and College of the Mainland.
United States Court of International Trade.
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiffs Phibro Energy USA, Inc. and Phibro Energy, Inc. (collectively "plaintiffs")1 move for judgment on the agency record pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56.1. In their motion plaintiffs seek judicial review of an order of the United States Foreign-Trade Zones Board (Board) denying as not in the public interest an application filed by the Port of Houston Authority for special-purpose subzone status for plaintiffs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
