1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 880 F.Supp.
  5. 880 F.Supp. 848 (1995)
 

FLORSHEIM SHOE CO. v. U.S.

Slip Op. 95-25. Court No. 94-10-00613.

880 F.Supp. 848 (1995)

FLORSHEIM SHOE CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

United States Court of International Trade.

February 16, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sonnenberg & Anderson (Steven P. Sonnenberg, Jerry P. Wiskin, and Michelle D. Mancias), for plaintiff.

Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice (Shalom Brilliant), Michael Young, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, of counsel, for defendant.

OPINION

DiCARLO, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff, Florsheim Shoe Company, challenges the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's denial of entry of elk skin shoes imported by Florsheim from Taiwan. The basis for the denial was a Presidential prohibition, issued pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 1978 (Supp. V 1993), the Pelly Amendment to the Fisherman's Protective Act of 1967. Florsheim contends the shoes fall outside of the prohibition. Pursuant to USCIT R. 56, Florsheim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases