1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 49 F.3d
  5. 49 F.3d 1551 (1995)
 

HIGH TECH MED. INSTRUMENTATION v. NEW IMAGE IND.

No. 94-1360.

49 F.3d 1551 (1995)

HIGH TECH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW IMAGE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack L. Slobodin, Cartwright, Slobodin, Bokelman, Borowsky, Wartnick, Moore & Harris, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Stephen J. Akerley.

Mark E. Miller, Fliesler, Dubb, Meyer & LoveJoy, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Martin C. Fliesler and Burt Magen.

Before MICHEL, SCHALL and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. C93-4152 SBA (June 3, 1994), granting a patent holder's motion for a preliminary injunction in a patent infringement suit. Although the district judge engaged in a detailed analysis that makes us reluctant to second-guess her judgment, we have concluded that the court committed legal errors...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases