1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 880 F.Supp.
  5. 880 F.Supp. 710 (1995)
 

SCHENDEL v. PIPE TRADES DIST. COUNCIL NO. 36

No. C-93-20732 PVT.

880 F.Supp. 710 (1995)

Kenneth SCHENDEL, Plaintiff, v. PIPE TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 36 PENSION PLAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

March 16, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Karachale, Horan, Lloyd, Karachale, Dyer, Horan & Schwartz, Inc., Monterey, CA, for plaintiff.

Neil Goldstein, Tom Quinlan, McCarthy, Johnson & Miller, San Francisco, CA, for defendants.

ORDER FOLLOWING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TRUMBULL, United States Magistrate Judge.

On October 25, 1994, plaintiff's and defendants' cross-motions for summary judgment came on for hearing. Pursuant to court order, the parties submitted additional briefing. The motion came under submission on January 26, 1995.

Plaintiff Kenneth Schendel sued Pipe Trades District Council No. 36 Pension Plan and the Trustees of the Plan [hereinafter collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases