1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 104 Ohio
  5. 104 Ohio App.3d 51 (1995)
 

STEINER v. VAN DORN CO.

Nos. 67173, 67174 and 67175.

104 Ohio App.3d 51 (1995)

STEINER et al.; Fulton et al., Appellants, v. VAN DORN COMPANY et al.; Arter & Hadden et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.

Decided May 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Fulton and Curtis V. Trinko, pro se.

Arter & Hadden, Stanley M. Fisher and Irene C. Keyse-Walker; Wechsler, Skirnick, Harwood, Halebian & Feffer, Stuart D. Wechsler, Robert T. Harwood and Jorn A. Holl; Kaufman & Cumberland Co., L.P.A., Thomas L. Feher and Steven S. Kaufman; Bragar & Wexler and Paul Wexler; and David L. Lee, prose.

HARPER, Judge.

William H. Fulton and Curtis V. Trinko appeal from the dismissal of their motion for a pro rata allocation and distribution of attorney fees and expenses by the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. The trial court ruled that it was without subject matter jurisdiction to rule on the motion.

I

Three complaints were filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County in January 1992, case Nos. CV-224743, CV-224809 and CV-226781...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases