1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 909 F.Supp.
  5. 909 F.Supp. 626 (1995)
 

RICHMOND v. DUKE

Civ. No. PB-C-95-473.

909 F.Supp. 626 (1995)

William RICHMOND, Plaintiff, v. James DUKE, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; Warden Reed; Assistant Warden Lay; Robert Clark, hearing (Disciplinary) Administrator; and Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division.

December 19, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Richmond, Grady, AR, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff William Richmond's pro se complaint (Docket No. 3), which seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff's complaint has been referred to a United States Magistrate,1 see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); E.D.Ark. Rule F-1(VIII)(A)(8), who has since presented the Court with his proposed Findings and Recommendation (Docket No. 4...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases