1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 886 F.Supp.
  5. 886 F.Supp. 634 (1995)
 

HILL v. DIEBOLD

No. C-1-94-381.

886 F.Supp. 634 (1995)

Carrell R. HILL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dorothy J. DIEBOLD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

May 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Joseph Huelsmann, Ft. Mitchell, KY, Lee E. Sitlinger, Louisville, KY, for plaintiffs.

George Gregory Lewis, Cincinnati Ins. Co., Cincinnati, OH, for defendants.

ORDER

STEINBERG, United States Magistrate Judge.

In Ohio, a plaintiff is entitled to an award of damages to compensate him for losses he is "reasonably certain" to incur in the future. Galayda v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc., 71 Ohio St.3d 421, 644 N.E.2d 298 (1994) (citing Pennsylvania Co. v. Files, 65 Ohio St. 403, 62 N.E. 1047 (1901). The principal purpose of the "reasonable certainty" rule is to prevent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases