DEPT. OF LAND v. CURRY COUNTY

LUBA No. 94-075; CA A86379.

888 P.2d 592 (1995)

132 Or.App. 393

DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, Respondent, v. CURRY COUNTY, Respondent, and River's End Ranch, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 18, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeff H. Bachrach argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were G. Frank Hammond and O'Donnell, Ramis, Crew, Corrigan & Bachrach.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause, for respondent Dept. of Land Conservation and Development. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

No appearance for respondent Curry County.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's remand of Curry County's comprehensive plan designation and zone change, under which 233 acres of a 272-acre parcel owned by petitioner would be redesignated from Forest Grazing to Rural Residential. We affirm.

The 272-acre parcel was part of a 1075-acre tract belonging to petitioner. In May, 1992, the tract was partitioned. The larger part had been and continued to be put to agricultural use and, according...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases