1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 38 Cal.App.4th
  5. 38 Cal.App.4th 1276 (1995)
 

ORD & NORMAN v. SURPLUS LINE ASSN. OF CALIFORNIA

Docket No. A065958.

38 Cal.App.4th 1276 (1995)

45 Cal. Rptr.2d 292

ORD & NORMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SURPLUS LINE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

August 31, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rockwell, Castle & Cason, Ray T. Rockwell and Gabriela A. Alvarez for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Leboeuf, Lamb, Greene & Macrae, James R. Woods, Sanford Kingsley, R. Scott Puddy and Lorraine A. Barrabee for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

CORRIGAN, J.

Appellant Ord & Norman (Ord), a law firm, contends the trial court wrongly granted summary judgment against Ord's claims that the Surplus Line Association of California (SLA) negligently breached a duty of care owed to Ord regarding its purchase of insurance from a foreign, nonadmitted insurer that later became insolvent. We find no breach of duty on the part of SLA and therefore affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases