BARROW
This criminal appeal challenges the admissibility of the testimony of the defendant's former wife concerning several statements the defendant made to her and items she found among the defendant's belongings during their marriage. We hold that the wife's testimony was not privileged under Code § 8.01-398 because it did not concern "any communication privately made" between the defendant and his former wife.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.