ANDERSON v. DIVITO

9203-01908; CA A82253.

908 P.2d 315 (1995)

138 Or. App. 272

Robert F. ANDERSON, Respondent—Cross-Appellant, v. Anthony F. DIVITO, Appellant—Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 13, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barbee B. Lyon, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the opening brief were William F. Martson, Jr., Scott G. Seidman, and Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland. With him on the reply brief and response on cross-appeal were William F. Martson, Jr., and Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth.

Jacob Tanzer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief was John M. Berman, Beaverton.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

Plaintiff brought an action for declaratory judgment to interpret the terms of a contract. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiff, after ruling that one of defendant's options to purchase plaintiff's interest in real property had expired. Defendant submits nine assignments of error related to that ruling. Plaintiff cross-appeals the trial court's denial of his request for prejudgment interest. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases