1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 882 F.Supp.
  5. 882 F.Supp. 334 (1995)
 

ARCHE, INC. v. AZALEIA, U.S.A., INC.

No. 93 Civ. 0817 (LAK).

882 F.Supp. 334 (1995)

ARCHE, INC., Plaintiff, v. AZALEIA, U.S.A., INC., et ano., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 12, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brooks Banker, Jr. and Barry G. Magidoff, Abberley Kooiman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Leonard J. Santisi and Adam Brookman, Curtis, Morris & Safford, P.C., New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a French manufacturer of ladies' footwear, claims that defendants, a Brazilian footwear manufacturer and its U.S. distributor, have violated their rights under the Lanham Act, among other legal doctrines, by imitating the trade dress of plaintiff's so-called P-sole shoes. The matter is before the Court on defendants' motions in limine. Defendants seek to exclude plaintiff's consumer survey, including...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases