1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 889 F.Supp.
  5. 889 F.Supp. 302 (1995)
 

EVANS v. JAY INSTRUMENT AND SPECIALTY CO.

No. C-1-93-0055.

889 F.Supp. 302 (1995)

Shirley J. EVANS, Plaintiff, v. JAY INSTRUMENT AND SPECIALTY COMPANY, et al. Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division.

April 26, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shirley J. Evans, Cincinnati, OH, pro se.

Phyllis B. Schiff, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiff.

Bruce Andrew Hoffman, Graydon, Head & Ritchey, Cincinnati, OH, for defendant.

ORDER

CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the motion of defendant, Jay Instrument and Specialty Company (Jay Instrument) for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 20). Plaintiff Ms. Shirley J. Evans (Evans), proceeding pro se, has responded in opposition to such motion. (Doc. No. 23). For the reasons set forth, infra, Jay Instrument's motion for summary judgment is well taken.

I. Introduction

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases