1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 898 F.Supp.
  5. 898 F.Supp. 282 (1995)
 

BLASENA v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

Civ.A. No. 93-4969.

898 F.Supp. 282 (1995)

John W. BLASENA, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, d/b/a Conrail, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan York Medvin, Medvin & Elberg, Newark, NJ, for John W. Blasena.

Thomas Conan Hart, Ruprecht & Hart, Millburn, NJ, for Consolidated Rail Corporation.

OPINION

CHESLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the application of defendant Consolidated Rail Corporation ("Conrail") for an order barring counsel for plaintiff from conducting "ex parte" interviews of defendant's employees and seeking additional relief with regard to such interviews which have already occurred. The motion was referred to the undersigned by the Honorable Harold A. Ackerman, U.S.D.J. Oral...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases