1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 875 F.Supp.
  5. 875 F.Supp. 261 (1995)
 

BERG ELECTRONICS, INC. v. MOLEX, INC.

Civ. A. No. 94-470-RRM.

875 F.Supp. 261 (1995)

BERG ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MOLEX, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 8, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald F. Parsons, Jr. & Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, Norman L. Norris, John P. Donohue, Jr., Frederic A. Tecce, Woodcock, Washburn, Kurtz, Mackiewicz & Norris, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Ben T. Castle, Josy W. Ingersoll, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, DE, Dennis R. Schlemmer, John E. Rosenquist, John W. Kozak, Paul J. Korniczky, Leydig, Vot & Mayer, Chicago, IL, for defendant.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

In this patent case, Molex, Incorporated contends it inadvertently produced during discovery copies of documents that would otherwise be protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege. It has moved for an order directing Berg Electronics, Inc. to return the documents. Berg has declined to return the documents, contending the disclosure is a waiver of the privilege and that the vast majority of the documents produced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases