1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 909 F.Supp.
  5. 909 F.Supp. 219 (1995)
 

NEW WEST URBAN RENEWAL CO. v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP.

Civ. No. 94-1033 (WHW).

909 F.Supp. 219 (1995)

NEW WEST URBAN RENEWAL CO., Plaintiff, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

November 21, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis M. Toft, Thomas W. Sabino, Wolff & Samson, Roseland, New Jersey, for Plaintiff, New West Urban Development Co.

Mark D. Shepard, Anne E. Mulgrave, Babst, Calland, Clements & Zomnir, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Defendant, Westinghouse Electric Corp.

AMENDED OPINION

WALLS, District Judge.

Plaintiff New West Urban Renewal Co. ("New West") and defendant Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse") have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to a Case Management Order issued by the Magistrate Judge, this motion presents two issues, referred to as: "The Contract Issue" and the "ECRA Issue." For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases