1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 875 F.Supp.
  5. 875 F.Supp. 204 (1995)
 

MIANO v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC.

Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (BN), 91 Civ. 1676 (BN) and 91 Civ. 3906(BN).

875 F.Supp. 204 (1995)

Louis MIANO, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard W. Meirowitz, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, P.C., Washington, DC (Gerald S. Hartman, Dona S. Kahn, Gregory W. Homer, John E. Menditto and Chaim Book, of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BERNARD NEWMAN, Senior Judge:1

In this consolidated action, three former advertising executives allege that they were unlawfully terminated by reason of their age. The case was assigned to the writer, sitting without a jury, for the purpose of determining whether, under Ford Motor Company v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219, 102 S.Ct. 3057, 73 L...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases