John R. BUTLER, Respondent-Cross-Appellant,
v.
STATE of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Carl Zenon, Richard Peterson and Dallas Robinson, Appellants-Cross-Respondents.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted September 14, 1994.
Decided December 13, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause, for appellants—cross-respondents. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.
Kathryn T. Whalen argued the cause, for respondent—cross-appellant. With her on the briefs were Amy R. Kent and Bennett & Hartman, Portland.
Before WARREN, P.J., and LEESON and HASELTON, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
WARREN, Presiding Judge.
Defendants1 appeal a second amended judgment for noneconomic, economic, and punitive damages in favor of plaintiff. They assign as error the failure of the trial court to give their requested jury instruction No. 7. Defendants also assign error to the trial court's order designating the judgment nunc pro tunc to the date of the original judgment and ordering that interest on the damages awarded to plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.