1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 877 F.Supp.
  5. 877 F.Supp. 185 (1995)
 

KING v. ALLIED VISION, LTD.

No. 92 Civ. 3852 (CBM).

877 F.Supp. 185 (1995)

Stephen KING, Plaintiff, v. ALLIED VISION, LTD., New Line Cinema Corporation and Innovation Books, a division of the Innovative Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., Paul R. Levenson, New York City, for plaintiff.

Leventhal Slade & Krantz, Melvyn R. Leventhal, Laura F. Dukess, New York City, for defendant.

Opinion on Contempt Purging

MOTLEY, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. In this court's opinion and order dated March 25, 1994 ("March Opinion"), 155 F.R.D. 440, defendant New Line Cinema Corporation ("New Line") was held in contempt of the Final Consent Decree ("Decree") entered in this action on May 17, 1993. Pursuant to the Decree, New Line was enjoined from using Stephen King's name in connection with the film "The Lawnmower Man," and was required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases