DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.
The appellant was convicted after a jury trial of robbery, kidnapping, arson, grand theft, and dealing in stolen property. He raises two issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain his conviction for first degree murder; and (2) whether it was improper to convict him of both grand theft and dealing in stolen property where these offenses are in connection with one scheme or course of conduct.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.