1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 902 F.Supp.
  5. 902 F.Supp. 149 (1995)
 

HRUBEC v. NATIONAL R.R. PASSENGER CORP.

No. 91 C 4447.

902 F.Supp. 149 (1995)

Ronald HRUBEC and Nijole Hrubec, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, a/k/a Amtrak; Robin Zarbo; Ernest R. Frazier; Michael Higdon; and John Doe, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Arthur Voci, Leadership Council, Chicago, IL, for plaintiffs.

Carl Roy Peterson, Nancy Shaw, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, IL, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge:

Presently before the court is plaintiff Ronald Hrubec's motion to amend his complaint. Hrubec maintains that the Supreme Court's ruling in Lebron v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., ___ U.S. ____, 115 S.Ct. 961, 130 L.Ed.2d 902 (1995), which was handed down after the most recent oral arguments before the Seventh Circuit but before that court ruled, has breathed new life into his twice-dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases