POPE, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of reckless conduct, a misdemeanor. See OCGA § 16-5-60(b). In two enumerations of error, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence against him. Specifically, he argues that his conduct constituted either simple negligence or intentional assault, but could not be considered reckless. We disagree and affirm.
Viewed in a light to support the verdict, the evidence shows that several county employees...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.