SUDIMAK v. PILLUS

Civ. A. No. 91-1167.

881 F.Supp. 152 (1995)

Maria SUDIMAK (Nee Thomas), Plaintiff, v. Joseph C. PILLUS and Dorr-Oliver Incorporated, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

March 30, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Thompson Bell, III, Stevens & Lee, Reading, PA, for Maria Sudimak.

Francis M. Milone, Valerie I. Harrison, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, PA, for Joseph C. Pillus and Dorr-Oliver Inc.


MEMORANDUM

VANASKIE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Maria Sudimak has moved for a new trial on her retaliatory discharge claim against Dorr-Oliver Incorporated ("Dorr-Oliver") under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act ("PHRA"), 43 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 951, et seq. Ms. Sudimak contends that, in light of the jury's affirmative response to the special verdict question of whether she had "met her burden of proving that Dorr-Oliver's stated reason...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases