1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 38 Cal.App.4th
  5. 38 Cal.App.4th 988 (1995)
 

PADRE DAM MUN. WATER DIST. v. BURKHARDT

Docket No. D021143.

38 Cal.App.4th 988 (1995)

45 Cal. Rptr.2d 506

PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOSEPH M. BURKHARDT et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

September 28, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Bruce W. Beach and Best, Best & Krieger for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thor O. Emblem and Tracy L. Emblem for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

BENKE, J. —

SUMMARY

The principal issue on appeal in this eminent domain proceeding is whether the defendant landowner properly disclosed the valuation evidence he offered at trial. We find that he did not.

Plaintiff and appellant Padre Dam Municipal Water District (Padre) acquired 4.2 acres of land owned by defendants and appellants Joseph M. Burkhardt et al. (Burkhardt).1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases