1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 889 F.Supp.
  5. 889 F.Supp. 128 (1995)
 

SANDERS v. QUIKSTAK, INC.

Nos. 94 Civ. 5592 (WCC), 94 Civ. 8924 (WCC).

889 F.Supp. 128 (1995)

Paul SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. QUIKSTAK, INC. and The Rexroth Corp., Defendants. Paul SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. QUIKSTAK, INC. and Lithibar Matik, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 28, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank, P.C., New City (Valerie J. Crown, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Standard Weisberg P.C., New York City (Arthur J. Liederman, of counsel), for defendant The Rexroth Corp.

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge:

Defendant The Rexroth Corp. ("Rexroth") has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons stated below, we deny the motion, without prejudice to renew after the completion of discovery.

BACKGROUND

At the time of the accident that forms the basis of this lawsuit, plaintiff Paul Sanders was employed by Package Pavement Co. to operate a palletizing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases