1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 889 F.Supp.
  5. 889 F.Supp. 121 (1995)
 

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK

No. 92 Civ. 3430 (HB).

889 F.Supp. 121 (1995)

The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew R. Kosloff, The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Litigation Division, New York City, for plaintiff.

Donald Tarkington, Novack and Macey, Chicago, IL, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BAER,1 District Judge:

Plaintiff, Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. ("Chase") moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the unambiguous language of the contract at issue required the defendants, who were guarantors of certain renovations, to pay Chase the amount required to complete said renovations. Defendants, Samuel Zell, B. Ann Lurie, and American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, moved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases