1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 885 F.Supp.
  5. 885 F.Supp. 123 (1995)
 

GEFEN BY GEFEN v. UPJOHN CO.

Civ. A. No. 95-CV-0098.

885 F.Supp. 123 (1995)

Keren GEFEN, by Sharon GEFEN and Ehud Gefen v. The UPJOHN COMPANY.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 2, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry L. Gross, Michael J. Stief, III, Stief, Waite, Gross, Sagoskin and Gilman, Newtown, PA, for plaintiff.

Kerry A. Kearney, Michael T. Scott, Barbara R. Binis, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved this Court to remand this action to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania on the ground that there is neither federal question nor diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) directs a district court to remand an action to state court if it appears that there is no subject matter jurisdiction. A district court may remand an action on jurisdictional

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases