SIGURDSON v. CARL BOLANDER & SONS, CO.

No. C4-93-1555.

511 N.W.2d 482 (1994)

Stuart SIGURDSON, Appellant, v. CARL BOLANDER & SONS, CO., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted March 31, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Singer, Frank Madden & Associates, Plymouth, for appellant.

Barbara Jean D'Aquila, Cosgrove, Flynn, Gaskins & O'Connor, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and LANSING and NORTON, JJ.


OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

In this disability and age discrimination case, appellant Stuart Sigurdson challenges summary judgment against him. On appeal, he argues that the district court failed to view the evidence in his favor, misinterpreted the law on evaluating evidence of disability discrimination, erred in concluding that Sigurdson had not established a prima facie case of age discrimination, and abused its discretion when it denied Sigurdson's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases