1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 866 F.Supp.
  5. 866 F.Supp. 122 (1994)
 

ENZO BIOCHEM, INC. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

No. 87 Civ. 6125 (DAB).

866 F.Supp. 122 (1994)

ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Development Corporation, Defendants, Enzo Diagnostics, Inc., Enzo Therapeutics, Inc., Enzolabs, Inc., Lattingtown Cytology Center, Inc., Additional Defendants on Counterclaim.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur S. Olick, Anderson Kill Olick & Oshinsky, New York City, for plaintiff.

Theodore B. Van Itallie, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTS, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendants cross-moved for summary judgment. Judge Kimba M. Wood issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated October 14, 1992, denying plaintiff's motion and granting in part and denying in greater part defendants' cross-motion. Defendants timely moved for reconsideration, which was opposed by plaintiff, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases