1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 851 F.Supp.
  5. 851 F.Supp. 106 (1994)
 

SEQUA CORP. v. GELMIN

No. 91 Civ. 8675 (CSH).

851 F.Supp. 106 (1994)

SEQUA CORPORATION And Sequa Capital Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey J. GELMIN, GBJ Corporation and Topaz Capital Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Butler, Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter, New York City, for GBJ Corp.

David M. Brodsky, Schulte Roth & Zabel, New York City for Sequa Corp., Sequa Capital Corp. and BT Securities Corp. New York.

Jack H. Weiner, New York City, for BT Securities Corp. New York, defendant.

David Golub, Silver Golub & Teitell, Stamford, CT, for David J. O'Brien.

David J. O'Brien, pro se.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Sequa Corporation ("Sequa") and Sequa Capital Corporation ("SCC") seek, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss the Ninth Counterclaim of defendant GBJ Corporation ("GBJ") and all counterclaims asserted by defendants Jeffrey J. Gelmin ("Gelmin") and Topaz Capital Corporation ("Topaz"). In addition, pursuant to Rule 12(f), plaintiffs move to strike...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases