1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 535 Pa.
  5. 535 Pa. 421 (1994)
 

PHILA. SUB. DEV. v. CHICKELERO

535 Pa. 421 (1994)

635 A.2d 1040

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. Albert CHICKELERO, Appellee, and A. Charles Peruto, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 28, 1994.

Reargument Denied March 22, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip L. Blackman, A. Charles Peruto, for appellant.

Carmen Nasuti, for Philadelphia Suburban Development Corp.

John Rogers Carroll, for Albert Chickelero.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision in this case.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a dissenting opinion.

PAPADAKOS, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent and would reach the merits of the case. The sole issue in this case is whether an indispensable party to a settlement agreement allegedly reached...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases